” Why should Optimism Collective keep rewarding these mercenary stars that will discard their tokens at first sight?” These addresses must be rewarded in future airdrops.
Mgomes stated, “One of the purposes of the airdrop was to incentivize people use the chain.” It doesnt matter if they decide to toss it away, as they already utilized Optimism. They will continue utilizing it if they like the chain.
On the Optimism forum, you can post that “legitimately suggests banning suppliers”. A parody of this post is thought about offending, violent, and in violation of neighborhood guidelines.
— Cobie (@cobie) June 1, 2022
Cointelegraph reported Tuesday that Ethereum layer-2 scaling was overwhelmed by need for the first OP governance token Airdrop. As 5% of token supply was distributed to around 250,000 eligible users,
Cobie sent a long counter-proposal to the online forum entitled “Extended Ineligibility for Future Airdrops”. It was temporarily eliminated because it was flagged as inappropriate, however has actually given that been renewed.
Mohammedt75 stated, “Very valid points. Incentivize individuals who care about the long-term and let those who do not care about it pack up and leave.
OxJohn identified several addresses that had gotten at least 32,000 OP tokens. He promptly disposed them on market, arguing that they were “counter-productive” and watered down governance.
JustinMarx, Member of the House, also made a fascinating counterpoint. He specified that dumpers should not be punished due to the fact that “you do not understand the personal situations” of anybody who discards their tokens.
This proposal was sent solely for feedback and ideas, and is still not all set to be voted on. Far, the reaction from the governance community is mixed.
Cobie, co-host of UpOnlys crypto podcast with almost 700,000. fans, was one of the most popular Crypto Twitter users to weigh-in. Cobie reacted in his normal satirical/mocking style to the proposition.
” I propose that we, Optimism Collective cancel future airdrops for anyone who has sold tokens in the previous 6 months. We can call these individuals prospective future purchasers if they have a history of bad behavior.
After being asked to react more seriously to the proposition, Cobie described numerous reasons that he believes it was a bad concept.
According to CoinGecko data the token opened at $1.43 and after that surged to $2.10. As more users got the totally free airdrop, OP fell to as low at $1.09, prior to increasing to $1.18 at time of composing. This represents a 43% drop.
The OP hodler suggested that these accounts be left out from the next round OP airdrops, with “a public listing of accounts that engages in this habits” exemption. According to them, this would result in the allotment of governance weight to just active individuals.
He specified that he did not disagree with the sentiment but “my lack support for this proposal” in it. It is really since the proposal does not go far enough.
Cobie suggested that potential future sellers be issued with a debt token, which they likewise think about the possibility of utilizing “physical violence” versus them.
OP was born. _ Drop Day will have an extensive retro next week. Drop 1 has actually been claimed at > 50%.
— Optimism (_) (@optimismPBC) June 1, 2022
Paraswap shit, the proposition to penalize $OP airdrop dumpers by omitting them future airdrops. You can penalize those who have utilized your chain. They need to go straight to Arbitrum, your competitor.
— NoSleepJon (@nosleepjon) June 1, 2022
Optimisms recently released governance token, OP has actually fallen 40% given that its peak at $2.10, triggering members to discuss barring those who have disposed their tokens in future airdrops.
A member of Optimisms governance community, OxJohn, made a proposal to the Optimism governance board to exempt addresses that had actually discarded 100% of the tokens they airdropped. This post drew in a great deal of attention from the neighborhood. It received 11,200 views and 305 replies.
Related: The ETH/USD trading pair brought in more traders during the first quarter 2022: Report
” Traders and price-speculators are the only ones who care. Governance performs the very same regardless of whether it is $2 or $1.50. Although it is possible to make governance attacks against Optimism more budget friendly by making big price changes, there isnt one mention of this in the initial proposition.
I was baited into posting a major post because OP Labs staff were distressed with my tone.https:// t.co/ wikRr8IB8Y pic.twitter.com/Z0fxtOJ8kx.
— Cobie (@cobie) June 1, 2022.
Find out more.
He stated, “And its not actually a concern due to the size of the drop or the short-term nature sell-pressure von instantaneous dumpers.”.
According to CoinGecko information the token opened at $1.43 and then rose to $2.10. As more users received the free airdrop, OP fell to as low at $1.09, prior to increasing to $1.18 at time of writing. A member of Optimisms governance neighborhood, OxJohn, made a proposition to the Optimism governance board to exempt addresses that had discarded 100% of the tokens they airdropped. Paraswap shit, the proposition to punish $OP airdrop dumpers by excluding them future airdrops. It is possible to make governance attacks against Optimism more economical by making big rate modifications, there isnt one reference of this in the initial proposal.
He talked about points like OPs initial cost being irrelevant, sellers with various intentions and the possibility of selling and still taking part in governance, the token being used to get consumers from Optimism and the ease of producing a new address to prevent restriction.